Teachers’ Choices: Are they the Right Books for Science Instruction?
Abstract
In the 21st century, amidst the widespread adoption of the Next Generation Science Standards, many elementary teachers find it challenging to consistently incorporate science instruction. Although the research literature indicates that using science-based content in the literacy block has the potential to improve student achievement in both areas, the process of identifying high-quality picture books can be challenging. Thus, the authors analyzed the annual Teachers’ Choices lists from 2000-2019, identifying 134 science-based books to determine their potential for integration with literacy instruction. Findings suggest the majority are engaging and provide accurate science content pertaining primarily to life science. Narrative and non-narrative information texts dominate the selections, and science-based biographies appear for the first time. Overall, the analysis indicates that the Teachers’ Choices books can be used as a resource for identifying high-quality, science-based picture books useful for introducing challenging science content in elementary classrooms.
Conflict of Interest
None.
References
- Akerson, V.L., Buck, G.A., Donnelly, L.A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I.S. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537–549.
- Altieri, J.L. (2011). Terrific trade books: Adapted from Content Counts! Developing disciplinary literacy skills, K-6. (Toolbox). The Reading Teacher, 65(1), 77–79.
- Altun, D. (2019). From story to science: The contribution of reading fiction and hybrid stories to conceptual change with young children. Children & Society, 33(5), 453–470 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1111/chso.12321
- Atkinson, T.S., Matusevich, M.N., & Huber, L. (2009). Making science trade book choices for elementary classrooms. The Reading Teacher, 62(6), 484–497.
- Bintz, W.P., Wright, P., & Sheffer, J. (2010). Using copy change with trade books to teach earth science. The Reading Teacher, 64(2), 106–119 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1598/RT.64.2.3
- Broemmel, A.D., & Rearden, K.T. (2006). Should Teachers Choose the Teachers’ Choices for Science? Reading Teacher, 60, 254–265.
- Bryce, N. (2011). Meeting the reading challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 474–485.
- Casteel, C.P., & Isom, B.A. (1994). Reciprocal processes in science and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 47, 538–545.
- Cervetti, G., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P., & Goldschmidt, P. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658.
- Coleman, J.M., Bradley, L.G., & Donovan, C.A. (2012). Visual representations in second graders’ information book compositions. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 31–45 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1002/TRTR.01100
- Crowther, D.T., Venable, C., & Barman, C. (2005). The making of “The List”: Understanding the selection process for the Outstanding Science Trade Book list. Science Scope, 28(6), 31–32.
- Donovan, C.A., & Smolkin, L.B. (2001). Genre and other factors influencing teachers’ book selections for science instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(4), 412–440.
- Donovan, C.A., & Smolkin, L.B. (2002). Considering genre, content, and visual features in the selection of trade books for science instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55, 502–520.
- Douville, P., Pugalee, D.K., & Wallace, J.D. (2003). Examining instructional practices of elementary science teachers for mathematics and literacy integration. School Science and Mathematics, 103, 388–396.
10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18124.x Google Scholar
- Fang, Z. (2014). Disciplinary literacy in science: Developing science literacy through trade books. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(4), 274–278.
- Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(8), 627–632.
- Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., … Henkel, M. (2008). Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found and learned. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2067–2089.
- Ford, D.J. (2006). Representations of science within children’s trade books. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 214–235.
- Fries-Gaither, J. (2009). Common misconceptions about plants. https://beyondpenguins.ehe.osu.edu/issue/polar-plants/common-misconceptions-about-plants
- Grysko, R.A., & Zygouris-Coe, V. (2020). Supporting disciplinary literacy and science learning in grades 3–5. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 485–499 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1002/trtr.1860
- Hall, K.W., & Williams, L.M. (2015). Science trade books and buddies: Involving 3rd graders in informational texts. Childhood Education, 91(2), 123–134 https://doi-org.proxy.lib.utk.edu/10.1080/00094056.2015.1018792
10.1080/00094056.2015.1018792 Google Scholar
- International Literacy Association. (2020). Teachers’ choices fact sheet. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/reading-lists/teachers-choices-fact-sheet.pdf?sfvrsn=d7f2af8e_18
- Kelly, L. (2018). An analysis of award-winning science trade books for children: Who are the scientists, and what is science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55, 1188–1210.
- Lovedahl, A.N., & Bricker, P. (2006). Using biographies in science class. Science & Children, 44(3), 38–43.
- Lundstrum, M. (2005). Link science and literacy. Instructor, 114(6), 25–26, 28, 60.
- Lupo, S.M., Berry, A., Thacker, E., Sawyer, A., & Merritt, J. (2020). Rethinking text sets to support knowledge building and interdisciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 513–524.
- Mahzoon-Hagheghi, M., Yebra, R., Johnson, R.D., & Sohn, L.N. (2018). Fostering a greater understanding of science in the classroom through children’s literature. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 6(1), 41–50.
- Malleus, E., Kikas, E., & Marken, T. (2017). Kindergarten and primary school children’s everyday, synthetic, and scientific concepts of clouds and rainfall. Research in Science Education, 47, 539–558.
- Mayer, D.A. (1995). How can we best use children’s literature in teaching science concepts? Science & Children, 32(6), 16–19, 43.
- Morrison, J.A., & Young, T.A. (2008). Using science trade books to support inquiry in the elementary classroom. Childhood Education, 84(4), 204.
10.1080/00094056.2008.10523008 Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, By states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
- National Council of the Social Studies. (2010). National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning and assessment. https://www.socialstudies.org/standards
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13165.
- National Science Teachers Association. (2020, April 30). About the Next Generation Science Standards. NSTA. https://ngss.nsta.org/about.aspx.
- Ouzts, D.T., Taylor, M.K., & Taylor, L.A. (2003). A learner-centered curriculum based on award-winning literature. Education, 124(1), 76–85.
- Pappas, C.C. (2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 226–250.
- Parks, M. (2018). Literature sources for primary environmental science teachers. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 55(1–2), 46–57.
- Rearden, K.T., & Broemmel, A.D. (2008). Beyond the talking groundhogs: Trends in science trade books. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20(2), 39–49.
10.1007/BF03173669 Google Scholar
- Rice, D.C. (2002). Using trade books in teaching elementary science: Fact and fallacies. The Reading Teacher, 55, 552–565.
- Shanahan, C. (2004). Better textbooks, better readers and writers. In E.W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory into practice (pp. 370–382). Newark, DE: International Reading Association & Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
10.1598/0872075192.20 Google Scholar
- Smith, M.H., & Trexler, C.J. (2006). A university-school partnership model: Providing stakeholders with benefits to enhance science literacy. Action in Teacher Education, 27(4), 23–34.
10.1080/01626620.2006.10463398 Google Scholar
- Sudol, P., & King, C.M. (1996). A checklist for choosing non-fiction trade books. The Reading Teacher, 49, 422–442.
- Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
More to Explore
- Annual Outstanding Science Trade Book List: https://www.cbcbooks.org/readers/reading-lists/best-of-lists/outstanding-science/
- Science Books & Nonfiction Text Teaching Resources: https://www.melissa-stewart.com/
- Multipurpose Poetry --Introducing Science Concepts and Increasing Fluency: http://www.readwritethink.org/classroom-resources/lesson-plans/multipurpose-poetry-introducing-science-69.html
- David Fitzsimmons and how he creates his photography and books (Curious Critter series): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhbA6jFoSK0