Article

Improving Reading Comprehension and Social Studies Knowledge in Middle School

Sharon Vaughn

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth A. Swanson

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
Greg Roberts

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeanne Wanzek

Florida State University, , Tallahassee, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephanie J. Stillman‐Spisak

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Solis

The Meadows Center for Preventing Educational Risk, The University of Texas at Austin, , USA

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah Simmons

Texas A&M University, , College Station, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 January 2013
Cited by: 52

Abstract

en

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of a content acquisition and reading comprehension treatment implemented by eighth‐grade social studies teachers. Using a within‐teacher design, the eighth‐grade teachers’ social studies classes were randomly assigned to treatment or comparison conditions. Teachers (= 5) taught the same instructional content to both treatment and comparison classes, but the treatment classes used instructional practices focused on teaching essential words, text as a source for reading and discussion, and team‐based learning approaches. Students in the treatment conditions (= 261) scored statistically higher than students in the comparison conditions (= 158) on all three outcomes: content acquisition (ES = 0.17), content reading comprehension (ES = 0.29), and standardized reading comprehension (ES = 0.20). Findings are interpreted as demonstrating support for the treatment in improving both knowledge acquisition and reading comprehension within content area instruction.

Chinese

zh

本研究旨在确定一项由教师施行的教学实验处理之效能,该实验处理针对八年级社会学科的内容习得与阅读理解。研究员利用教师组内设计,把八年级社会学科教师的班别,随机分配到教学实验情况与对照情况,以比较其效能。实验组与对照组的教师(人数 = 5)教授相同的教学内容,但实验组的教学实施却着重教授重要单词、出自于文本的阅读与讨论、以及团队学习方法。统计分析结果显示,在三项成绩表现上,实验组学生(人数 = 261)均显著高于对照组学生(人数 = 158);该三项成绩包括内容习得(效应量 =0.17)、内容阅读理解(效应量 =0.29)和标准阅读理解(效应量 =0.20)。这些研究结果说明这项教学实验处理在内容教学中,能够支援学生的知识习得和阅读理解的改进。

Spanish

es

La meta de este estudio fue determinar la eficacia de un tratamiento de adquisición de contenido y comprensión de lectura implementado por maestros de ciencias sociales de octavo grado. Usando un diseño del maestro interior (within-teacher), las clases de ciencias sociales de maestros de octavo grado fueron escogidas al azar para recibir el tratamiento o ser el grupo de control. Los maestros (n = 5) usaron el mismo contenido en ambas clases, pero las clases que recibieron el tratamiento se enfocaron en enseñar palabras esenciales, en el texto como fuente de lectura y discusión, y en acercamientos en grupo. Los estudiantes que recibieron el tratamiento (n = 261) obtuvieron calificaciones estadísticamente mejores que los estudiantes del grupo de control (n = 158) en los tres resultados: adquisición de contenido (ES = 0. 17), comprensión del contenido leído (ES ‐ 0.29), y la comprensión estandarizada de lectura (ES = 0.20). Se interpretaron los resultados como mostrando apoyo por el tratamiento para mejorar tanto la adquisición de conocimiento como la comprensión de lectura en la instrucción de áreas de contenido.

Russian

ru

Иccлeдoвaтeлипoпытaлиcьoпpeдeлитьэффeктивнocтьпoдxoдa, кoтopыйcпocoбcтвyeтизyчeниюмaтepиaлa и пoнимaниюпpoчитaннoгo.Пoдxoдпpимeнялcя в paбoтe c вocьмиклaccникaминaзaнятияxoбщecтвeнныминayкaми, пpичeмyчитeля (n = 5) дaвaлитpaдициoнныeypoки и ypoки c пpимeнeниeминнoвaциoннoгoпoдxoдa. Cpaвнeниepeзyльтaтoвпpoвoдилocь c yчeтoмбeccoзнaтeльныxизмeнeний в пoвeдeнииcaмиxyчитeлeй в paзныxyчeбныxcитyaцияx.Пpeдмeтнoecoдepжaниeypoкoвбылooдинaкoвым, нooбyчeниe в paмкaxиннoвaциoннoгoпoдxoдaпpeдпoлaгaлoaнaлиз и ycвoeниeзнaчимыxтepминoв, a тeкcтиcпoльзoвaлcядлячтeния и oбcyждeния в мaлыxгpyппax.Пocpaвнeнию c yчaщимиcякoнтpoльныxклaccoв (n = 158), yчeники, paбoтaвшиe в paмкaxнoвoгoпoдxoдa (n = 261), пoкaзaлиcтaтиcтичecкизнaчимыйпoлoжитeльныйpeзyльтaтoбyчeнияпoвceмтpeмпapaмeтpaм: ycвoeниecoдepжaния (ES = 0.17), пoнимaниeпpoчитaннoгo (ES = 0.29) и cтaндapтизиpoвaннoeпoнимaниeпpoчитaннoгo (ES = 0.20). Peзyльтaтыдoкaзывaютyмecтнocтьпpимeнeниядaннoгoпoдxoдaдляpaбoты c тeкcтoм в paзличныxпpeдмeтныxoблacтяx.

French

fr

Cette étude avait pour but de déterminer l'efficacité d'un traitement de l'acquisition du contenu et de la compréhension de la lecture mis en place par des enseignants se sciences sociales en huitième année. En utilisant un plan inter‐enseignants, les classes de sciences sociales ont été attribuées de façon aléatoire aux conditions traitement et comparaison. Les enseignants (n=5) ont enseigné le même contenu pédagogique aux classes traitement et comparaison, mais les classes traitement ont utilisé des pratiques pédagogiques centrées sur l'enseignement des termes principaux, le texte en tant que source de lecture et de discussion, et les approches basées sur le travail d’équipe. Les élèves de la condition traitement (n=261) ont obtenu des résultats statistiquement plus élevés que ceux de la condition comparaison (n = 158) dans trois secteurs : acquisition des connaissances (ES= 0.17), compréhension du contenu de la lecture (ES= 0.17), et compréhension standard de la lecture (ES= 0.20). Les résultats ont été interprétés comme apportant un soutien au traitement dans la mesure où il permet d'améliorer aussi bien l'acquisition des connaissances que la compréhension de la lecture dans le cas des disciplines basées sur les connaissances.

Arabic

ar

لقد هدفت هذه الدراسة إلى تحديد فعالية معالجة اكتساب محتوى واستيعاب القراءة المنفذ على أيدي معلمي الدراسات الاجتماعية في الصف الثامن الإعدادي. وباستخدام تصميم ضمن‐معلم، تم تعيين صفوف معلمي الدراسات الاجتماعية عشوائياً لظروف معالجة أو مقارنة. وقد علم المعلمون (عددهم = 5) المحتوى التعليمي نفسه لكل من الصفوف المقارنة والمعالجة مع أن الصفوف المعالجة استخدمت ممارسات تعليمية مركزة على تدريس الكلمات الرئيسية والنص كمصدر للقراءة والنقاش ومناهج التعليم الجماعي. وقد حصل الطلاب في الظروف المعالجة (عددهم = 261) على أعلى علامات إحصائياً من الطلاب في الظروف المقارنة (عددهم = 158) في جميع النتائج الثلاثة: اكتساب المحتوى (حجم مؤثر = 0.07) واستيعاب قراءة المحتوى (حجم مؤثر = 0. 29) واستيعاب القراءة المعيارية (حجم مؤثر = 0.20). وقد تم تفسير النتائج على أساس إظهار الدعم للمعالجة في تحسين كل من اكتساب المعرفة واستيعاب القراءة ضمن تعليم مجال المحتوى.

Number of times cited: 52

  • , Efficacy of a Word- and Text-Based Intervention for Students With Significant Reading Difficulties, Journal of Learning Disabilities, 10.1177/0022219418775113, 52, 1, (31-44), (2018).
  • , The Application of Empirically Supported Practices in Middle School Social Studies Classrooms, Remedial and Special Education, 10.1177/0741932517744662, 39, 6, (341-352), (2017).
  • , Historical Literacy Research for Students with and at Risk for Learning Disabilities: A Systematic Review, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33, 4, (237-249), (2018).
  • , Strategy Instruction Shifts Teacher and Student Interactions During Text‐Based Discussions, Reading Research Quarterly, 53, 2, (175-195), (2017).
  • , Progress Monitoring in Social Studies Using Vocabulary Matching Curriculum‐Based Measurement, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 2, (112-120), (2017).
  • , The Strategic Use of Scaffolded Instruction in Social Studies Interventions for Students with Learning Disabilities, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 3, (155-165), (2017).
  • , Special Education Teachers Integrating Reading with Eighth Grade U.S. History Content, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32, 2, (99-111), (2017).
  • , Reading Intervention for Poor Readers at the Transition to Secondary School, Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 5, (408), (2017).
  • , Building Better Bridges: Teaching Adolescents Who Are Poor Readers in Eighth Grade to Comprehend History Text, Learning Disability Quarterly, 40, 3, (174), (2017).
  • , Effects of text-to-speech software use on the reading proficiency of high school struggling readers, Assistive Technology, 29, 3, (146), (2017).
  • , Engaging Struggling Adolescent Readers to Improve Reading Skills, Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 3, (357-382), (2016).
  • , Middle School Reading Comprehension and Content Learning Intervention for Below-Average Readers, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33, 1, (37), (2017).
  • , The Production of Human Capital in Developed Countries, , 10.1016/bs.hefe.2016.08.006, (95-322), (2017).
  • , Theoretically guided interventions for adolescents who are poor readers, Theories of Reading Development, 10.1075/swll.15.26vau, (489-506), (2017).
  • , Improving Reading and Social Studies Learning for Secondary Students With Reading Disabilities, TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49, 4, (249), (2017).
  • , Enhancing Adolescents’ Comprehension of Text by Building Vocabulary Knowledge, TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50, 2, (84), (2017).
  • , Text-Based Argumentation With Multiple Sources: A Descriptive Study of Opportunity to Learn in Secondary English Language Arts, History, and Science, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26, 1, (79), (2017).
  • , Situated Word Learning: Words of the Year (WsOY) and Social Studies Inquiry, Theory & Research in Social Education, (1), (2017).
  • , Teaching for deeper political learning: a design experiment, Journal of Curriculum Studies, (1), (2017).
  • , Development of reading comprehension, Theories of Reading Development, 10.1075/swll.15.16van, (283-306), (2017).
  • , Implementation of a Text‐Based Content Intervention in Secondary Social Studies Classes, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016, 154, (31-48), (2016).
  • , Effects of a Text-Processing Comprehension Intervention on Struggling Middle School Readers, Topics in Language Disorders, 36, 4, (368), (2016).
  • , Textbook Characteristics That Support or Thwart Comprehension: The Current State of Social Studies Texts, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 3, (247), (2016).
  • , Literacy and Text Reading in Middle and High School Social Studies and English Language Arts Classrooms, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 3, (199), (2016).
  • , Reading Comprehension in Latin America: Difficulties and Possible Interventions, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2016, 152, (71-84), (2016).
  • , Writing SMARTER goals for professional learning and improving classroom practices, Reflective Practice, 17, 5, (621), (2016).
  • , Common Themes in Teaching Reading for Understanding: Lessons From Three Projects, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60, 3, (255-264), (2016).
  • , English Learner and Non-English Learner Students With Disabilities, Exceptional Children, 82, 4, (428), (2016).
  • , A systematic review of reading interventions for secondary school students, International Journal of Educational Research, 79, (116), (2016).
  • , Reading Comprehension, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 1, (62), (2016).
  • , Mind mapping as a meta-learning strategy: Stimulating pre-adolescents’ text-learning strategies and performance?, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 46, (128), (2016).
  • , Team‐Based Learning for Students with High‐Incidence Disabilities in High School Social Studies Classrooms, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 1, (3-14), (2015).
  • , The Effects of an Intensive Reading Intervention for Ninth Graders with very Low Reading Comprehension, Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 30, 3, (104-113), (2015).
  • , Reading Comprehension Instruction for Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: A Reality Check, Education Sciences, 5, 4, (413), (2015).
  • , Improving Middle-School Students’ Knowledge and Comprehension in Social Studies: a Replication, Educational Psychology Review, 27, 1, (31), (2015).
  • , The efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading in middle school science and social studies classes, Reading and Writing, 28, 9, (1257), (2015).
  • , Research on Learning and Instruction, Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2, 1, (33), (2015).
  • , Mediating Complex Texts in the Upper Grades, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58, 8, (650-659), (2015).
  • , Improving Reading Comprehension and Social Studies Knowledge Among Middle School Students With Disabilities, Exceptional Children, 81, 4, (426), (2015).
  • , Effects of reading instruction on learning outcomes in social studies: A synthesis of quantitative research, The Journal of Social Studies Research, 39, 4, (183), (2015).
  • , Building BRIDGES, Exceptional Children, 81, 4, (399), (2015).
  • , Re‐Envisioning Instruction, The Reading Teacher, 67, 7, (547-559), (2014).
  • , Applying Research in Reading Comprehension to Social Studies Instruction for Middle and High School Students, Intervention in School and Clinic, 49, 3, (142), (2014).
  • , Evidence-Based Practices in a Changing World, Educational Researcher, 43, 5, (242), (2014).
  • , Team-Based Learning: Moderating Effects of Metacognitive Elaborative Rehearsal and Middle School History Content Recall, Educational Psychology Review, 26, 3, (451), (2014).
  • , Designing Reading Comprehension Assessments for Reading Interventions: How a Theoretically Motivated Assessment Can Serve as an Outcome Measure, Educational Psychology Review, 10.1007/s10648-014-9269-z, 26, 3, (403-424), (2014).
  • , Social Studies Progress Monitoring and Intervention for Middle School Students, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 38, 4, (224), (2013).
  • , Strategies for Improving Understanding of and Engagement with Expository Text for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, Beyond Behavior, 23, 1, (3), (2013).
  • , Who Gets to Read What? Tracking, Instructional Practices, and Text Complexity for Middle School Struggling Readers, Reading Research Quarterly, , (2018).
  • , Effects of Reading Comprehension and Vocabulary Intervention on Comprehension-Related Outcomes for Ninth Graders With Low Reading Comprehension, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 10.1080/10573569.2018.1499059, (1-17), (2018).
  • , The effectiveness of team-based flipped learning on a vocational high school economics classroom, Interactive Learning Environments, 10.1080/10494820.2018.1528284, (1-12), (2018).
  • , Content-area reading comprehension and teachers’ use of instructional time: effects on middle school students’ social studies knowledge, Reading and Writing, 10.1007/s11145-018-9925-7, (2018).