Using Context as an Assist in Word Solving: The Contributions of 25 Years of Research on the Interactive Strategies Approach
Corresponding Author
Donna M. Scanlon
University at Albany, State University of New York, USA
Correspondence
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorKimberly L. Anderson
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Donna M. Scanlon
University at Albany, State University of New York, USA
Correspondence
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorKimberly L. Anderson
East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Recently, there has been growing concern about how to most effectively support the literacy development of beginning and struggling readers with regard to helping them learn to effortlessly identify the huge number of words that proficient readers ultimately learn to read with automaticity. Some, noting the critical importance of phonics instruction in learning to read in an alphabetic writing system, take the position that students should attend only to alphabetic information in word-solving attempts. However, long-standing theories of the development of word-reading skills support the value of teaching students to use both alphabetic and contextual information in word solving in interactive and confirmatory ways. The authors summarize 25 years of research in which beginning and struggling readers were taught to use both code- and meaning/context-based strategies for word solving and were provided with explicit, responsive instruction focused on the alphabetic code. The authors present brief summaries of theoretical explanations of the word-learning process. Then, the authors summarize six experimental studies that, together, included students in kindergarten through fourth grade and involved the implementation of the Interactive Strategies Approach in the primary grades and an extension of the approach with middle elementary students with reading difficulties. The studies resulted in substantially improved reading outcomes among treatment versus business-as-usual groups. The authors contend that using both phonics- and context-based information facilitates the ability to build sight vocabulary, which in turn enables readers to turn their attention to the most important goal of literacy learning: meaning construction.
References
- Adams, M.J. (1998). The three-cueing system. In J. Osborn & F. Lehr (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 73–99). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Anderson, K.L. (2009). The effects of professional development on early reading skills: A comparison of two approaches (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (ATT 3365837)
- Anderson, K.L. (2019). Explicit instruction for word solving: Scaffolding developing readers’ use of code-based and meaning-based strategies. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 63(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2018.1542585
- Anderson, K.L., Gelzheiser, L., & Scanlon, D.M. (2007). Strategic Reading Inventory–primary. Unpublished instrument.
- Bear, D.R., Invernizzi, M., Templeton, S., & Johnston, F. (2004). Words their way: Word study for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
- Clay, M.M. (1987). Learning to be learning disabled. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 22(2), 155–173.
- Clay, M.M. (2001). Change over time in children’s literacy development. Chicago, IL: Heinemann.
- Ehri, L.C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
- Ehri, L.C. (2014). Orthographic mapping in the acquisition of sight word reading, spelling memory, and vocabulary learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2013.819356
- Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C.A., Dimino, J., … Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
- Fountas, I.C., & Pinnell, G.S. (2007). Fountas & Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System–1: Grades K–2, levels A-N. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
- Gelzheiser, L.M., Hallgren-Flynn, L., Connors, M., & Scanlon, D.M. (2014). Reading thematically related texts to develop knowledge and comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 68(1), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1271
- Gelzheiser, L.M., Scanlon, D.M., Hallgren-Flynn, L., & Connors, M. (2019). Comprehensive reading intervention in grades 3–8: Fostering word learning, comprehension, and motivation. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Gelzheiser, L.M., Scanlon, D.M., Vellutino, F.R., Deane, G., & Wang, S. (2020). Effects of the Interactive Strategies Approach–extended on the reading achievement of intermediate-grade struggling readers with limited reading accuracy. Manuscript in preparation.
- Gelzheiser, L.M., Scanlon, D.M., Vellutino, F.R., Hallgren-Flynn, L., & Schatschneider, C. (2011). Effects of the Interactive Strategies Approach–extended: A responsive and comprehensive intervention for intermediate grade struggling readers. The Elementary School Journal, 112(2), 280–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/661525
- Goodman, K.S. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6(4), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388076709556976
10.1080/19388076709556976 Google Scholar
- Gunning, T. (2008). Teacher’s guide for word building ( 2nd ed.). Honesdale, PA: Phoenix Learning Resources.
- Hammill, D.D., & Swanson, H.L. (2006). The National Reading Panel’s analysis of phonics instruction: Another point of view. The Elementary School Journal, 107(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.1086/509524
- Hanford, E. (2019, August 22). At a loss for words: How a flawed idea is teaching millions of kids to be poor readers [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.apmreports.org/story/2019/08/22/whats-wrong-how-schools-teach-reading
- Invernizzi, M., Meier, J., Swank, L., & Juel, C. (1999). PALS-K: Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening–kindergarten. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
- Kilpatrick, D. (2020). The study that prompted Tier 2 of RTI: Why aren’t our Tier 2 results as good? The Reading League Journal, 1(1), 28–31.
- LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6(2), 293–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(74)90015-2
- Landi, N., Perfetti, C.A., Bolger, D.J., Dunlap, S., & Foorman, B.R. (2006). The role of discourse context in developing word form representations: A paradoxical relation between reading and learning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(2), 114–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2005.12.004
- Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. (2006). Qualitative Reading Inventory–4. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J.S. (2010). Qualitative Reading Inventory–5. Boston, MA: Pearson.
- McGee, L.M., Kim, H., Nelson, K.S., & Fried, M.D. (2015). Change over time in first graders’ strategic use of information at point of difficulty in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(3), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.98
- Mesmer, H.A., & Williams, T.O. (2015). Examining the role of syllable awareness in a model of concept of word: Findings from preschoolers. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(4), 483–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.111
- Nagy, W.E., & Anderson, R.C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19(3), 304–330. https://doi.org/10.2307/747823
- National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Pearson, P.D., & Gallagher, M. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
- Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Piasta, S.B., Connor, C.M., Fishman, B.J., & Morrison, F.J. (2009). Teachers’ knowledge of literacy concepts, classroom practices, and student reading growth. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13(3), 224–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430902851364
- Savage, R., Georgiou, G., Parrila, R., & Maiorino, K. (2018). Preventative reading interventions teaching direct mapping of graphemes in texts and set-for-variability aid at-risk learners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(3), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2018.1427753
- Scanlon, D.M. (n.d.-a). Multi-Level Passage Assessment. Unpublished instrument.
- Scanlon, D.M. (n.d.-b). The Primary Decoding Test. Unpublished instrument.
- Scanlon, D.M., & Anderson, K.L. (2010). Using the Interactive Strategies Approach to prevent reading difficulties in an RTI context. In M.Y. Lipson & K.K. Wixson (Eds.), Successful approaches to RTI: Collaborative practices for improving K–12 literacy (pp. 20–65). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
10.1598/0834.02 Google Scholar
- Scanlon, D.M., Anderson, K.L., & Sweeney, J.M. (2017). Early intervention for reading difficulties: The Interactive Strategies Approach ( 2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
- Scanlon, D.M., Gelzheiser, L., Fanuele, D., Sweeney, J., & Newcomer, L. (2003). Classroom Language Arts Systematic Sampling and Instructional Coding (CLASSIC). Unpublished manuscript, Child Research and Study Center, University at Albany, State University of New York.
- Scanlon, D.M., Gelzheiser, L.M., Vellutino, F.R., Schatschneider, C., & Sweeney, J.M. (2008). Reducing the incidence of early reading difficulties: Professional development for classroom teachers vs. direct interventions for children. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(3), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.05.002
- Scanlon, D.M., & Vellutino, F.R. (1996). Prerequisite skills, early instruction, and success in first-grade reading: Selected results from a longitudinal study. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 2(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1996)2:1<54:AID-MRDD9>3.0.CO;2-X
10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1996)2:1<54::AID-MRDD9>3.0.CO;2-X Google Scholar
- Scanlon, D.M., Vellutino, F.R., Small, S.G., Fanuele, D.P., & Sweeney, J.M. (2005). Severe reading difficulties—can they be prevented? A comparison of prevention and intervention approaches. Exceptionality, 13(4), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1304_3
10.1207/s15327035ex1304_3 Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S., & Sparks, S.D. (2019, October 2). How do kids learn to read? What the science says. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/how-do-kids-learn-to-read.html
- Seidenberg, M.S., & Borkenhagen, M.C. (2020). Reading science and educational practice: Some tenets for teachers. The Reading League Journal, 1(1), 7–11.
- Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55(2), 151–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2
- Share, D.L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and the self-teaching hypothesis. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 31–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00002-5
- Siegler, R.S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language ( 6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Mathew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.21.4.1
- Swanson, H.L. (2001). Searching for the best model of instructing students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34(2), 1–15.
- Tunmer, W.E., & Chapman, J.W. (2012). Does set for variability mediate the influence of vocabulary knowledge on the development of word recognition skills? Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(2), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2010.542527
- Vellutino, F.R. (2010). “Learning to be learning disabled”: Marie Clay’s seminal contribution to the Response to Intervention approach to identifying specific reading disability. The Journal of Reading Recovery, 10(1), 5–23.
- Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (2002). The Interactive Strategies Approach to reading intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(4), 573–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00002-4
- Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: More evidence against the IQ–achievement discrepancy definition of reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(3), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300302
- Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A., Chen, R., & Denckla, M.B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601
- Venezky, R.L. (1999). The American way of spelling: The structure and origins of American English orthography. New York, NY: Guilford.
- Wang, H.-C., Castles, A., Nickels, L., & Nation, K. (2011). Context effects on orthographic learning of regular and irregular words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.11.005
- Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests–revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
- Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.